🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an adorable small “sweetheart”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective companion. Zephyr has “endless energy” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a tussle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned controversy over their destiny often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been carefully observed by the humans who interact with them daily.

After the Canadian government disallowed the transfer of the belugas to China, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to euthanize them unless the government funds the cost of their survival. Canada’s marine resources official has refused that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, problem solving and social skills indicate they are highly cognitive creatures – something Kristy Burgess observed directly.

Burgess spent several years as a beluga trainer, a job that involved gaining confidence of the marine predators.

“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She developed a deep bond for two female belugas with different temperaments.

“One whale selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “They altered the way I understand connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a background of growing public opposition to their captivity.

During her tenure at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park links to age-related causes, but which activists say indicates the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not open to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand results of the cessation. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and navigate with fragments in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not respond to a inquiry, but earlier claimed: “The whales … receive far higher quality medical attention and 24/7 supervision than any individual in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was dismissed from the park in recent months following the death of Eos, an unwell beluga the employees had to put down. She said the facility thought information of the incident were leaked to the press and she was let go soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any plans to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “significant manpower”, trucks and specialized tools.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for demands for the whales to be removed promptly from the park, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official turned down a bid to transfer the whales to China.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a continued situation in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As the public, we know that whales should be in the ocean, not in pools for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience approve an export that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s statements indicate a broader misunderstanding of the circumstances of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As officials struggle to find a resolution, proposals have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A suggested refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received official endorsement, has proven contentious. The planned location, which includes extensive space of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a long term resolution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the idea of a protected habitat reflects a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable solution in the near future.

An official, director of the initiative, said the location will simulate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|