🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is pursuing damages valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move is a clear warning by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days on a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory actions, such as confiscating European corporate assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has assumed a prominent position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the new lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in European nations are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant assets can be located," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are developing steps to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. They are also crafting safeguards to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she stated. "It also sends a clear message that when you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."